DFDA

Laparoscopic/Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

Treatment for Genital Prolapse

Effectiveness
90%
Safety Score
65%
Clinical Trials
6
Participants
8K

Comparative Safety Scale(Higher is safer)

Cyanide☠️
Meth💀
Cigarettes🚬
Chemo☢️
Alcohol🍺
Morphine💊
Antibiotics💉
Tylenol💊
Exercise🏃
Water💧
65
DangerousModerateSafe
Treatment Details
Time to Effect
Immediate anatomical correction; symptom resolution 6-12 weeks post-op
Treatment Duration
One-time surgery, recovery 6-8 weeks
Evidence Quality
HIGH
Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
7(Treat 7 patients to see 1 additional successful outcome)
Number Needed to Harm (NNH)
15(Treat 15 patients to see 1 additional serious adverse event)
Confidence Score
95%confidence in effectiveness data
Health Economics
Annual Cost of Care
Drug Cost:$0
Monitoring:$500
Side Effect Mgmt:$700
Total Annual:$21,200
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Cost-Effectiveness Rating
GOOD
ICER
$65,000/QALY
QALYs Gained
1
Outcome-Based Costs
Cost per Responder
$23,555.56
Cost per Remission
$25,853.66
Comparison vs Native Tissue Repair
Cost Difference
+$8,200/year
More expensive
QALY Difference
+0.30 QALYs
Better outcomes
Dominance
No dominance
Laparoscopic/Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes

for Genital Prolapse

Efficacy Outcomes
Overall Effectiveness
+90%
Response Rate
+90%
Remission Rate
+82%
Common Side Effects
Post-operative pain
+35%
Infection
+5%
Bleeding/Hematoma
+5%
Mesh erosion/exposure
+10%
Dyspareunia (painful intercourse)
+10%
Urinary symptoms (e.g., urgency, stress incontinence)
+15%
Recurrence of prolapse
+7%

Sources:

amegroups.cn
amegroups.org
nih.gov

WARNING: LIMITED TRIALS AVAILABLE

You can search for trials, but you probably can't join any because the 1% Treaty hasn't passed yet. Most trials are severely limited by lack of funding and bureaucratic barriers. Help change this!

Active Clinical Trials
2 active trials recruiting for Laparoscopic/Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Genital Prolapse

Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse

NCT05063331RECRUITINGNA
View Study
320 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Jacksonville, United States +6 more
Started: Dec 15, 2021

Evaluating Artisential Laparoscopic Instruments in Gynecologic Surgery

NCT06050161NOT YET RECRUITINGNA
View Study
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Started: Sep 20, 2023
Completed Clinical Trials
4 completed trials for Laparoscopic/Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Genital Prolapse

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse

NCT00551993COMPLETEDNA
View Study
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Cleveland, United States
Started: Sep 1, 2006

Impact of Level III Support Procedure on Enlarged Genital Hiatus After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy

NCT04480671COMPLETEDNA
View Study
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Pittsburgh, United States
Started: Aug 26, 2020

Minimally Invasive Burch Colposuspension to Reduce Occult Stress Incontinence

NCT03841513COMPLETEDNA
View Study
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Chicago, United States +1 more
Started: Jan 29, 2019

Prospective Cohort Study of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using MPATHY Restorelle Mesh

NCT01320618COMPLETED
View Study
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
Started: May 1, 2009