Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy
Treatment for Hemorrhoids
Typical Dosage: Surgical procedure
Effectiveness
92%
Safety Score
55%
Clinical Trials
28
Participants
120K
Comparative Safety Scale(Higher is safer)
Cyanide☠️
Meth💀
Cigarettes🚬
Chemo☢️
Alcohol🍺
Morphine💊
Antibiotics💉
Tylenol💊
Exercise🏃
Water💧
55
DangerousModerateSafe
Treatment Details
Dosage Range
Surgical procedure
Time to Effect
4-6 weeks for full recovery
Treatment Duration
Single procedure, recovery 4-6 weeks
Evidence Quality
HIGHConfidence Score
90%confidence in effectiveness data
Health Economics
Annual Cost of Care
Drug Cost:$150
Monitoring:$400
Side Effect Mgmt:$750
Total Annual:$8,000
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Cost-Effectiveness Rating
EXCELLENTICER
$13,333/QALY
QALYs Gained
0.6
Outcome-Based Costs
Cost per Responder
$8,602
Cost per Remission
$9,091
Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Outcomes
for Hemorrhoids
Efficacy Outcomes
Overall Effectiveness
+92%
Response Rate
+93%
Remission Rate
+88%
Common Side Effects
Post-operative pain
+95%
Bleeding
+8%
Anal stenosis
+3%
Infection
+2%
Active Clinical Trials
2 active trials recruiting for Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in Hemorrhoids
RCT Comparing Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy With Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty
NCT04329364RECRUITINGPHASE2, PHASE3
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Singapore, Singapore
Started: Oct 1, 2020
HELO Trial: Energy-Based Therapies vs. Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III Hemorrhoids
NCT07333040NOT YET RECRUITINGNA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
Started: Mar 1, 2026
Completed Clinical Trials
11 completed trials for Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in Hemorrhoids
Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy
NCT01263431COMPLETEDPHASE4
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Milan, Italy
Started: Jul 1, 2010
HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial
NCT02216305COMPLETEDNA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Barcelona, Spain
Started: Sep 1, 2014
Thrombosed External Hemorrhoids: Comparison of the Thrombectomy and Local Excision Procedures in Terms of Results and Outcome (TEH)
NCT03903536COMPLETED
96 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye) +1 more
Started: Sep 1, 2020
Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Grade III and IV Disease:Harmonic Scalpel Compared With Conventional Technique
NCT03938714COMPLETEDNA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Lahore, Pakistan
Started: Aug 27, 2015
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
NCT03848468COMPLETEDNA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Lahore, Pakistan
Started: Apr 1, 2014
Symptom Control 1-year After Circular Stapler Anopexy or Diathermy Excision for Prolapsed Haemorhoids
NCT00841620COMPLETEDPHASE4
207 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Odense C, Denmark
Started: Sep 1, 1999
Ligasure Versus Diathermy Haemorrhoidectomy Under Local Anesthesia
NCT00617448COMPLETEDNA
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Viladecans, Spain
Started: May 1, 2005
Topical Versus Oral Metronidazole Following Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy
NCT03343509COMPLETEDPHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Auckland, New Zealand +1 more
Started: Mar 11, 2019
Trans-anal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) vs. Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT01244672COMPLETEDNA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Stony Brook, United States
Started: Dec 1, 2009
Minimal Invasive Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty vs Conventional Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in II-III Grade Hemorrhoidal Disease
NCT04944407COMPLETEDNA
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Napoli, Italy
Started: Jan 1, 2017
Study of a New Circular Anal Dilator
NCT00693459COMPLETEDNA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
Cleveland, United States
Started: May 1, 2008
Showing 20 of 29 total trials